General
Stanley Marczak, by John Marczak, His Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. Brooklyn City Railroad Company, Defendant, Impleaded with Chamberlain of the City of New York, Appellant
237 A.D. 841·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1932·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Stanley Marczak, by John Marczak, His Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. Brooklyn City Railroad Company, Defendant, Impleaded with Chamberlain of the City of New York, Appellant.
Affd., 262 N. Y.--.
[MAJORITY]
Order reversed on the law, without costs, and motion denied, without costs. On the facts presented by this record we are of opinion that it cannot be held that the chamberlain acted unreasonably, improperly or negligently in making the investment herein. (Chesterman v. Eyland, 81 N. Y. 398.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur. [147 Misc. 399.]