General
James G. Tinsley et al., Respondents, v. Paul Weidinger, Appellant
130 N.Y. 676·New York Court of Appeals·1891·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
James G. Tinsley et al., Respondents, v. Paul Weidinger, Appellant.
(Argued December 9, 1891;
decided December 23, 1891.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Court of Common Pleas in and for the city and county of New York, entered upon an order made the first Monday of March, 1890, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered, upon a verdict directed by the court, and affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Edward W. /S. Johnston for appellant.
Michael JET. Gardozo for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm ; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.