IP
American Tri-Ergon Corp. et al. v. Radtke Patents Corp. et al.; Radtke Patents Corp. et al. v. Coe, Commissioner of Patents, et al.; and Whitson Photophone Corp. et al. v. Coe, Commissioner of Patents, et al.
314 U.S. 695·Supreme Court of the United States·1941
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 661.
No. 705.
No. 740.
American Tri-Ergon Corp. et al. v. Radtke Patents Corp. et al.; Radtke Patents Corp. et al. v. Coe, Commissioner of Patents, et al.; and Whitson Photophone Corp. et al. v. Coe, Commissioner of Patents, et al.
December 22, 1941.
Mr. Kenneth S. Neal for petitioners in No. 661; Mr. Leonard Day for petitioners in No. 705; and Mr. Joseph A. Shay for petitioners in No. 740. Assistant Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attor ney General Shea, and Messrs. Melvin H. Siegel and Paul A. Sweeney for the Commissioner of Patents in No. 661. Solicitor General Fahy for the Commissioner of Patents in Nos. 705 and 740.
[MAJORITY]
Petitions for writs of certiorari to the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia denied.
Reported below: 122 E. 2d 937.