General
James L. O'Neill, as Assignor of Paul Whitin Manufacturing Company, Respondent, v. Edward N. Perkins and Harry A. Van Bergen, Trading under the Firm Name, etc., Appellants
167 A.D. 940·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1915·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
James L. O’Neill, as Assignor of Paul Whitin Manufacturing Company, Respondent, v. Edward N. Perkins and Harry A. Van Bergen, Trading under the Firm Name, etc., Appellants.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. (See Mills v. Sparrow, 131 App. Div. 241.) Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.