Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Edison Electric Company, Appellant, v. The City of Pasadena et al., 1909 — 214 U.S. 528 · caselaw · US
General
The Edison Electric Company, Appellant, v. The City of Pasadena et al.
214 U.S. 528·Supreme Court of the United States·1909
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 122.
The Edison Electric Company, Appellant, v. The City of Pasadena et al.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of California.
March 16, 1909.
Mr. H. H. Trowbridge for appellant.
Mr. C. J. Willett, Mr. William J. Hunsaher and Mr. J. P. Wood for .appellees.
[MAJORITY]
Dismissed with costs, on authority of counsel for appellant.