Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Davis et al. v. Cinema Classics, Ltd., Inc., et al.; and Busch et al. v. Cinema Classics, Ltd., Inc., et al., 1972 — 405 U.S. 983 · caselaw · US
General
Davis et al. v. Cinema Classics, Ltd., Inc., et al.; and Busch et al. v. Cinema Classics, Ltd., Inc., et al.
405 U.S. 983·Supreme Court of the United States·1972
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. A-905.
No. A-913.
Davis et al. v. Cinema Classics, Ltd., Inc., et al.; and Busch et al. v. Cinema Classics, Ltd., Inc., et al.
[MAJORITY]
D. C. C. D. Cal. Applications for stay of preliminary injunction presented to Mr. Justice Powell, and by him referred to the Court, denied.