Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
PRINCESS THERESA OWANA KAOHELELANI, etc., Appellant, v. BISHOP TRUST COMPANY, Limited, a Hawaiian Corporation, Appellee, 1932 — 58 F.2d 1084 · caselaw · US
Corporations
PRINCESS THERESA OWANA KAOHELELANI, etc., Appellant, v. BISHOP TRUST COMPANY, Limited, a Hawaiian Corporation, Appellee
58 F.2d 1084·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
PRINCESS THERESA OWANA KAOHELELANI, etc., Appellant, v. BISHOP TRUST COMPANY, Limited, a Hawaiian Corporation, Appellee.
No. 6749.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
June 20, 1932.
M. Louo Heen, of Honolulu, Hawaii, for appellant.
Robertson & Castle, of Honolulu, Hawaii, for appellee.
Before WILBUR, Circuit Judge, and JAMES and NORCROSS, District Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Upon motion of counsel for appellee, ordered appeal herein dismissed for noneompliance by appellant with the provisions of rules 23 and 24 of the Rules of Practice of this court.