Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Angeline Odell, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant, 1900 — 162 N.Y. 625 · caselaw · US
General
Angeline Odell, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant
162 N.Y. 625·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Concur: Pabkeb, Oh. J., O’Bbien, Babtlett, Haight, Mabtin, Vann and Landon, JJ.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Angeline Odell, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant.
Odell v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. T. Co., 18 App. Div. 13, affirmed.
(Submitted March 9, 1900;
decided March 27, 1900.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered June 4, 1897, reversing a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal. of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term, and granting a new trial.
Charles C. Paulding for appellant.
William H. H. Ely for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered for plaintiff on the stipulation, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Pabkeb, Oh. J., O’Bbien, Babtlett, Haight, Mabtin, Vann and Landon, JJ.