Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Lucien B. Terry et al., Respondents, v. Henry Bange, Appellant, 1890 — 121 N.Y. 695 · caselaw · US
General
Lucien B. Terry et al., Respondents, v. Henry Bange, Appellant
121 N.Y. 695·New York Court of Appeals·1890·NY
All concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Lucien B. Terry et al., Respondents, v. Henry Bange, Appellant.
(Argued June 2, 1890;
decided June 17, 1890.)
Appeal from Order of the General Term of the Superior Court of the city of New York, made March 4, 1890, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion to vacate the appointment of a receiver herein.
Edward Perkins for appellant.
William, C. Holbrooh for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss appeal; no opinion.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.