Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Vaughns et al. v. Board of Education of Prince Georges County, Maryland, et al.; and Vaughns et al. v. Board of Education of Prince Georges County, Maryland, et al., 1973 — 410 U.S. 918 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Vaughns et al. v. Board of Education of Prince Georges County, Maryland, et al.; and Vaughns et al. v. Board of Education of Prince Georges County, Maryland, et al.
410 U.S. 918·Supreme Court of the United States·1973
Mr. Justice Brennan, Mr. Justice Blackmun, and Mr. Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
January 26, 1973
No. A-789.
No. A-790.
Vaughns et al. v. Board of Education of Prince Georges County, Maryland, et al.; and Vaughns et al. v. Board of Education of Prince Georges County, Maryland, et al.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 4th Cir. Applications for stays presented to The Chief Justice, and by him referred to the Court, denied.
Mr. Justice Brennan, Mr. Justice Blackmun, and Mr. Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.