Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Toronto General Trusts Company, as Trustee, Appellant, v. The Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad Company, Respondent, et al., 1893 — 138 N.Y. 657 · caselaw · US
General
The Toronto General Trusts Company, as Trustee, Appellant, v. The Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad Company, Respondent, et al.
138 N.Y. 657·New York Court of Appeals·1893·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Toronto General Trusts Company, as Trustee, Appellant, v. The Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad Company, Respondent, et al.
(Argued June 6, 1893;
decided June 20, 1893.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made April 14, 1892, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendant, the Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Bail-road ^Company, entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
F. K. Pendleton for appellant.
FlÁhu Root for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion of General Term.
All concur, except Gray, J., not sitting, and Maynard, J., not voting.
Judgment affirmed.