Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David KAHAN, Defendant-Appellant, and Dominick Quottrocci, Defendant, 1934 — 70 F.2d 1022 · caselaw · US
General
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David KAHAN, Defendant-Appellant, and Dominick Quottrocci, Defendant
70 F.2d 1022·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David KAHAN, Defendant-Appellant, and Dominick Quottrocci, Defendant.
No. 402.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
April 30, 1934.
Abraham Zemloek, of New York City, for appellant.
Howard W. Ameli, U. S. Atty., of Brooklyn, N. Y. (Emanuel Bubliek and William T. Cowin, Asst. U. S. Attys., both of Brooklyn, N. Y., of counsel), for the United States.
Before MANTON, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Judgment of conviction affirmed.