Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Stephen DUNCAN, Warden, petitioner, v. Lawrence OWENS., 2015 — 136 S. Ct. 500 · caselaw · US
General
Stephen DUNCAN, Warden, petitioner, v. Lawrence OWENS.
136 S. Ct. 500193 L. Ed. 2d 363·Supreme Court of the United States·2015
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Stephen DUNCAN, Warden, petitioner,
v.
Lawrence OWENS.
No. 14-1516 (15A475).
Supreme Court of the United States
Nov. 13, 2015.
Application to recall and stay the mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in case No. 14-1419 presented to Justice KAGAN and by her referred to the Court granted, pending the sending down of the judgment of this Court. The request seeking that the respondent be returned to the applicant's custody pending final disposition of this case denied, thus leaving that determination for the state court.