General
MASLOWSKY et al. v. CASSIDY, CHAIRMAN, ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES COMMISSION, et al.
385 U.S. 11·Supreme Court of the United States·1966
Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Brennan are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
MASLOWSKY et al. v. CASSIDY, CHAIRMAN, ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES COMMISSION, et al.
No. 574.
Decided October 10, 1966.
Albert E. Jenner, Jr., and Thomas P. Sullivan for appellants.
Owen Rail for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question.
Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Brennan are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.