Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Robert J. WITTMAN, et al., appellants, v. Gloria PERSONHUBALLAH, et al., 2015 — 136 S. Ct. 499 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Robert J. WITTMAN, et al., appellants, v. Gloria PERSONHUBALLAH, et al.
136 S. Ct. 499193 L. Ed. 2d 364·Supreme Court of the United States·2015
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Robert J. WITTMAN, et al., appellants,
v.
Gloria PERSONHUBALLAH, et al.
No. 14-1504.
Supreme Court of the United States
Nov. 13, 2015.
Further consideration of the question of jurisdiction postponed to the hearing of the case on the merits. In addition to the questions presented by the jurisdictional statement, parties are directed to brief and argue the following question: Whether appellants lack standing because none reside in or represent the only congressional district whose constitutionality is at issue in this case.