Contracts · MBE-tested
OLCOTT v. CARTWRIGHT et al.
115 F. 1020·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1902
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
OLCOTT v. CARTWRIGHT et al.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
May 20, 1902.)
No. 1,022.
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Texas.
T. D. Cobbs, for plaintiff in error.
S. R. Frost, R. S. Neblett, M. L. Crawford, and W. L. Crawford, for defendants in error.
Before PARDEE, McCORMICK, and SHELBY, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
After an attentive and careful examination of the voluminous transcript, and full consideration of the many assigned errors in the proceedings on the trial in the circuit court, aided by full oral argument and able and exhaustive briefs, we are constrained to hold that none of the errors assigned are well taken, and that on the face of the record there is no plain reversible error. The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.