Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Chatfield Leonard, as Receiver of Curtis A. Barnum, a Judgment Debtor, Appellant, v. Curtis A. Barnum et al., Respondents, Impleaded with Another, 1901 — 167 N.Y. 595 · caselaw · US
General
Chatfield Leonard, as Receiver of Curtis A. Barnum, a Judgment Debtor, Appellant, v. Curtis A. Barnum et al., Respondents, Impleaded with Another
167 N.Y. 595·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Chatfield Leonard, as Receiver of Curtis A. Barnum, a Judgment Debtor, Appellant, v. Curtis A. Barnum et al., Respondents, Impleaded with Another.
(Argued April 19, 1901;
decided June 4, 1901.)
Smith v. Barnum, 50 Hun, 602, appeal dismissed.
Appeal from a final judgment in favor of defendants, entered November 9, 1900, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department reversing an interlocutory judgment of Special Term overruling demurrers to the complaint.
Clarence L. Barber for appellant.
Carlton B. Pierce for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Yann, Landon and Cullen, JJ. Not sitting: Martin, J.