Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
CPG Products Corp. et al. v. Antimonopoly, Inc., 1983 — 459 U.S. 1227 · caselaw · US
IP
CPG Products Corp. et al. v. Antimonopoly, Inc.
459 U.S. 1227·Supreme Court of the United States·1983
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 82-1075.
CPG Products Corp. et al. v. Antimonopoly, Inc.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 9th Cir. Motions for leave to file briefs as amici curiae by the following were granted: United States Trademark Association, Committee on Trademarks and Unfair Competition of the Association of the Bar of the City of New York, Grocery Manufacturers of America, Inc., Bar Association of the District of Columbia et al., Chamber of Commerce of the United States, National Association of Manufacturers, Toy Manufacturers of America, Inc., and Procter & Gamble Co. Certiorari denied.