Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
McNamara et al. v. Salvation Army, Inc. Appeal from the Supreme Court of Kansas; and Hart v. State of Washington, 1947 — 332 U.S. 750 · caselaw · US
General
McNamara et al. v. Salvation Army, Inc. Appeal from the Supreme Court of Kansas; and Hart v. State of Washington
332 U.S. 750·Supreme Court of the United States·1947
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 201.
McNamara et al. v. Salvation Army, Inc. Appeal from the Supreme Court of Kansas; and Hart v. State of Washington.
No. 226.
William Robert Koerner for appellant in No. 226.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The appeals are dismissed for want of jurisdiction. § 237 (a), Judicial Code, as amended, 28 U. S. C. § 344 (a). Treating the papers whereon the appeals were allowed as petitions for writs of certiorari as required by § 237 (c) of the Judicial Code, as amended, 28 U. S. C. § 344 (c), certiorari is denied.