General
HUFF et al. v. BIDWELL et al.
176 F. 1022·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1910
Before PARDEE, McCORMICK, and SHELBY, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
HUFF et al. v. BIDWELL et al.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
April 12, 1910.)
No. 2,048.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Georgia.
For opinion below, see 176 Fed. 174.
Du Pont Guerry, J. H. Hall, and T. S. Felder, for appellants.
John I. Hall, W. G. Smith, T. E. Ryals, W. J. Grace, James L. Anderson, George S. Jones, N. E. Harris, Chas. H. Hall, Jr., R. L. Anderson, Walter A. Harris, and J. E. Harris, for appellees.
Before PARDEE, McCORMICK, and SHELBY, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The original decree, as affirmed in this court, required-all the property of the defendant Huff to be sold to pay off, adjust, and satisfy the many liens thereon,- and in the conduct and management of the sale complained of the trial judge had and exercised a sound discretion. As the case is presented by the r.ecbrd, we conclude that the sale in question was properly confirmed. The‘decree appealed from is affirmed, and, considering the large amount of funds tied up by the appeal, mandate, will issue at once.