Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Charles A. Clegg, Respondent, v. Andrew J. Aikens et al., Respondents, The Aikens Newspaper Union, Appellant, 1888 — 109 N.Y. 612 · caselaw · US
Tax
Charles A. Clegg, Respondent, v. Andrew J. Aikens et al., Respondents, The Aikens Newspaper Union, Appellant
109 N.Y. 612·New York Court of Appeals·1888·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles A. Clegg, Respondent, v. Andrew J. Aikens et al., Respondents, The Aikens Newspaper Union, Appellant.
(Argued February 28, 1888;
decided March 13, 1888.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme-Court in the first judicial department, made October 26,1887, modifying and affirming, as modified, an order of Special Term disallowing certain items taxed by the appellant in its bill of costs, and denying an application for a further-reference.
Philip Carpenter for appellant.
Wm. Ford Upson for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Order affirmed.