Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Joseph J. MOEBS, Appellant, v. POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, a Corporation, Mason M. Patrick, Harleigh H. Hartman et al., Appellees, 1933 — 64 F.2d 702 · caselaw · US
Corporations
Joseph J. MOEBS, Appellant, v. POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, a Corporation, Mason M. Patrick, Harleigh H. Hartman et al., Appellees
64 F.2d 702·United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Joseph J. MOEBS, Appellant, v. POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, a Corporation, Mason M. Patrick, Harleigh H. Hartman et al., Appellees.
No. 5662.
Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia.
Argued Feb. 14, 1933.
Decided March 27, 1933.
Charles F. Diggs, Richard E. Shands, and Cornelius H. Bull, all of Washington, D. C., for appellant.
S. R. Bowen and John S. Barbour, both of Washington, D. C., for appellee Potomac Electric Power Co.
William W. Bride and William A. Roberts, both of Washington, D. C., for inter-vener Public Utilities Commission.
Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB, VAN ORSDEL, HITZ, and GRONER, Associate Justices.
[MAJORITY — GRONER, Associate Justice.]
GRONER, Associate Justice.
This case is controlled by the opinion and decision in Lewis v. Potomac Electric Power Co.,-- App. D. C.-, 64 F.(2d) 701, decided this day, and the decree of the lower court is therefore affirmed.
Affirmed.