Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Texas v. Central Power & Light Co., 1967 — 389 U.S. 933 · caselaw · US
General
Texas v. Central Power & Light Co.
389 U.S. 933·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 551.
Texas v. Central Power & Light Co.
Crawford C. Martin, Attorney General of Texas, George M. Cowden, First Assistant Attorney General, J. C. Davis and W. 0. Shultz II, Assistant Attorneys General, and A. J. Carubbi, Jr., for petitioner.
H. K. Howard for respondent.
Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General, Aim B. Handler, First Assistant Attorney General, and Elias Abelson and William J. Walsh, Deputy Attorneys General, for the State of New Jersey, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition.
[MAJORITY]
Ct. Civ. App. Tex., 13th Sup. Jud. Dist. Certiorari denied.