General
Bowen v. Johnston, Warden
324 U.S. 876·Supreme Court of the United States·1945
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 868.
Bowen v. Johnston, Warden.
April 9, 1945.
Hugh A. Bowen, pro se. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Tom C. Clark, Mr. Robert S. Erdahl and Miss Beatrice Rosenberg for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.