Contracts · MBE-tested
CHICAGO & NORTH WESTERN RAILWAY CO. et al. v. CHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY RAILROAD CO. et al.
382 U.S. 422·Supreme Court of the United States·1966
Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
CHICAGO & NORTH WESTERN RAILWAY CO. et al. v. CHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY RAILROAD CO. et al.
No. 751.
Decided January 24, 1966.
Jordan Jay Hillman, Bryce L. Hamilton and John C. Danielson for appellants in No. 751. Robert W. Ginnane and Leonard S. Goodman for appellant in No. 752.
Eldon Martin, Robert J. Cooney, Frank S. Farrell, Robert G. Gehrs, William P. Higgins, Curtis H. Berg, John H, Bishop, Louis E. Torinus, Jr., and Paul M. Sand for appellees in both cases.
Together with No. 752, Interstate Commerce Commission v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. et al., also on appeal from the same court.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.