Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Carlota Benitez Sampayo v. United States et al.; Carlota Benitez Sampayo v. Bank of Nova Scotia; and Carlota Benitez Sampayo v. Bank of Nova Scotia et al., 1945 — 324 U.S. 859 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Carlota Benitez Sampayo v. United States et al.; Carlota Benitez Sampayo v. Bank of Nova Scotia; and Carlota Benitez Sampayo v. Bank of Nova Scotia et al.
324 U.S. 859·Supreme Court of the United States·1945
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 351.
No. 352.
No. 353.
Carlota Benitez Sampayo v. United States et al.; Carlota Benitez Sampayo v. Bank of Nova Scotia; and Carlota Benitez Sampayo v. Bank of Nova Scotia et al.
March 12, 1945.
Car-lota Benitez Sampayo, pro se.
Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Littell, Mr. Vernon L. Wilkinson and Miss Wilma C. Martin for the United States, and Mr. Henri Brown for the Bank of Nova Scotia, respondents.
[MAJORITY]
The petitions for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit are denied.
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.
Reported below: 141 F. 2d 939, 942, 943.