Contracts · MBE-tested
Rochester Dry Goods Company, Appellant, v. Louise K. Fahy, Respondent
188 N.Y. 629·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Rochester Dry Goods Company, Appellant, v. Louise K. Fahy, Respondent.
(Argued May 1, 1907;
decided May 21, 1907.)
Rochester Dry Goods Co. v. Fahy, 111 App. Div. 748, affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment entered March 22,1906, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department overruling plaintiff’s exceptions, ordered to be heard in the first instance by the Appellate Division, denying a motion for a new trial and directing judgment for defendant on a nonsuit granted at the Trial Term in an action to recover for an alleged breach of contract.
Henry Adsit Bull for appellant.
George A. Carnahan for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.