Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
United States v. Havemeyer; and Havemeyer v. United States, 1945 — 326 U.S. 759 · caselaw · US
General
United States v. Havemeyer; and Havemeyer v. United States
326 U.S. 759·Supreme Court of the United States·1945
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 388.
No. 389.
United States v. Havemeyer; and Havemeyer v. United States.
November 5, 1945.
Solicitor General McGrath, Assistant Solicitor General Judson, Assistant Attorney General Clark, Messrs. Sewall Key, Arnold Baum and Miss Helen R. Carloss for the United States.
Messrs. Preston B. Kava-nagh and William M. Sperry, 2nd for Havemeyer.
[MAJORITY]
Petitions for writs of certiorari to the Court of Claims denied.
Reported below: 103 Ct. Cls. 564, 59 F. Supp. 537.