Torts · MBE-tested
Bertha Adlersheim, Appellant, v. Frank Salzman, Respondent; Berl Adlersheim, Appellant, v. Frank Salzman, Respondent
234 A.D. 840·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1931·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Bertha Adlersheim, Appellant, v. Frank Salzman, Respondent. Berl Adlersheim, Appellant, v. Frank Salzman, Respondent.
[MAJORITY]
It may not be said that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. The verdict, however, was clearly against the weight of the evidence. Therefore, the judgment is reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellants to abide the event. Present ■— Finch, P. J., McAvoy, Martin, O’Malley and Townley, JJ.