General
Louis B. Prahar, Respondent, v. Rosalie Tousey, as Executrix of Frank Tousey, Deceased, Appellant
184 N.Y. 609·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Louis B. Prahar, Respondent, v. Rosalie Tousey, as Executrix of Frank Tousey, Deceased, Appellant.
Prahar v. Tousey, 107 App. Div. 623, affirmed.
(Argued March 29, 1906;
decided April 17, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered August 18, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict directed by the court and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
James M. Sunt for appellant.
John E. Brodsky for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Werner, Hiscook and Chase, JJ. Absent: O’Brien, J.