Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Hadley Falls National Bank, Respondent, v. Reuben May, Appellant, 1885 — 99 N.Y. 671 · caselaw · US
General
Hadley Falls National Bank, Respondent, v. Reuben May, Appellant
99 N.Y. 671·New York Court of Appeals·1885·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Hadley Falls National Bank, Respondent, v. Reuben May, Appellant.
(Argued June 15, 1885;
decided June 26, 1885.)
Abram Kling for appellant.
Frederick S. Parker for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion below, and for judgment absolute against defendant on stipulation.
All concur.
Order affirmed, and judgment accordingly.