Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
UNITED STATES ex rel. GONZALEZ et al. v. KIRK, Sheriff, et al., 1930 — 39 F.2d 246 · caselaw · US
General
UNITED STATES ex rel. GONZALEZ et al. v. KIRK, Sheriff, et al.
39 F.2d 246·United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas·1930
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNITED STATES ex rel. GONZALEZ et al. v. KIRK, Sheriff, et al.
No. 1007.
District Court, S. D. Texas at Galveston.
March 7, 1930.
W. E. Price, of Galveston, Tex., for petitioner.
M. S. MeCorquodale, Asst. Dist. Atty.,. of Houston, Tex.', opposed.
[MAJORITY — HUTCHESON, District Judge.]
HUTCHESON, District Judge.
This is a case in which the applicant makes a bona fide claim of citizenship. Under these circumstances, she is entitled to a judicial trial on the facts. Ex parte Kazan (D. C.) 5 F.(2d) 243.
The United States presents against her claim to a judicial determination of the fact of citizenship the proposition that she is in the same case as one excluded, and that this court has no jurisdiction to consider her case except by review of the completed action of the Department of Labor. Kwock Jan Fat v. White, 253 U. S. 454, 40 S. Ct. 566, 64 L. Ed. 1010; Low Wah Suey v. Backus, 225 U. S. 460, 32 S. Ct. 734, 56 L. Ed. 1165; Jung See v. Nash (C. C. A.) 4 F.(2d) 643.
None of these eases have application to the present one. Here the applicant effected entrance into the United States without surreption or evasion, but with the express consent of the Department of Labor.
Under these circumstances, plaintiff is entitled to a judicial trial upon her claim of citizenship, and that being established to the satisfaction of the court, the department is without jurisdiction to take any proceedings against her.
Relator should therefore have her writ and thereupon be discharged.