General
Nordstrom v. State of Washington
181 U.S. 616·Supreme Court of the United States·1901
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 389.
Nordstrom v. State of Washington.
Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Washington.
Motions to dismiss or affirm submitted May 27, 1901.
Decided May 28, 1901.
Mr. Walter S. Fulton and Mr. Frank B. Crosthwaite for the motions. Mr. James Hamilton Lewis opposing.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Nobles v. Georgia, 168 U. S. 398; Nordstrom v. Van de Vanter, 181 U. S. 616, and cases cited.