Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Charles Robinson, Respondent, v. The New York, Lake Erie and Western Railroad Company, Appellant, 1888 — 109 N.Y. 658 · caselaw · US
Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
Charles Robinson, Respondent, v. The New York, Lake Erie and Western Railroad Company, Appellant
109 N.Y. 658·New York Court of Appeals·1888·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles Robinson, Respondent, v. The New York, Lake Erie and Western Railroad Company, Appellant.
(Argued April 10, 1888;
decided June 5, 1888.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Superior Court of the city of New York, made December 12, 1887, which affirmed an order of reference in the above entitled action.
J. A. Buchanan for appellant.
Henry L. Burnett for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur,
Order affirmed.