Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
CHIN TOY, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, 1928 — 24 F.2d 1014 · caselaw · US
General
CHIN TOY, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
24 F.2d 1014·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1928
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
CHIN TOY, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
March 3, 1928.
Rehearing Denied March 31, 1928.
No. 5064.
Appeal from the District Court of the-United States for the Eastern District of. Louisiana; Louis H. Burns, Judge.
Chandler C. Luzenberg, of New Orleans, La., for appellant.
Wayne G. Borah, U. S. Atty., and E. E. Talbot, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of New Orleans, La., for the United States.
Before WALKER, BRYAN, and POSTER, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The order or decree appealed from is affirmed.