Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Irving et al. v. Capehart, Trustee in Reorganization, 1968 — 393 U.S. 801 · caselaw · US
General
Irving et al. v. Capehart, Trustee in Reorganization
393 U.S. 801·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 137.
Irving et al. v. Capehart, Trustee in Reorganization.
Donald A. Schabel for petitioners.
H. Earl Capehart, Jr., for respondent,.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 7th Cir. Petition for writ of certiorari dismissed July 12, 1968, pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court.