Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
James Stoddard, Respondent, v. John McAuliffe et al., Appellants, 1897 — 151 N.Y. 671 · caselaw · US
General
James Stoddard, Respondent, v. John McAuliffe et al., Appellants
151 N.Y. 671·New York Court of Appeals·1897·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
James Stoddard, Respondent, v. John McAuliffe et al., Appellants.
Stoddard, v. McAuliffe, 81 Hun, 524, affirmed.
(Argued January 29, 1897;
decided February 12, 1897.)
Appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered November 28, 1894, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict directed by the court.
Deniel P. Mahony for appellants.
George S. Hastings for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.