Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Chatfield Leonard, as Receiver of the Property of Curtis A. Barnum, Appellant, v. Carlton B. Pierce, Respondent, Impleaded with Others, 1904 — 179 N.Y. 560 · caselaw · US
General
Chatfield Leonard, as Receiver of the Property of Curtis A. Barnum, Appellant, v. Carlton B. Pierce, Respondent, Impleaded with Others
179 N.Y. 560·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Chatfield Leonard, as Receiver of the Property of Curtis A. Barnum, Appellant, v. Carlton B. Pierce, Respondent, Impleaded with Others.
Reported below, 94 App. Div. 266.
(Argued October 3, 1904;
decided October 11, 1904.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment entered June 4, 1904, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, which reversed an interlocutory judgment of Special Term overruling a demurrer to the complaint and sustained such demurrer.
The motion was made upon the ground that the appeal was unauthorized.
Garitón B. Fierce for motion.
Olarence L. Barber opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.