Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Casper M. GROSBERG et al., Executors, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 1934 — 69 F.2d 1006 · caselaw · US
Tax
Casper M. GROSBERG et al., Executors, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
69 F.2d 1006·United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Casper M. GROSBERG et al., Executors, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.
No. 2877.
Circuit Court of Appeals, First Circuit.
March 28, 1934.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The Court to-day entered the following final decree in this ease: “Upon confession of error filed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is reversed, and the ease is remanded to that Board for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of the United States Supreme Court in Guy T. Helvering, Commissioner, v. Julia Butterworth. et al., Trustees, decided December 11, 1933,” 290 U. S. 365, 54 S. Ct. 221, 78 L. Ed.-.