Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Holder, Attorney General v. Mojica; Holder, Attorney General v. Parra Camacho; Holder, Attorney General v. Becerra; Holder, Attorney General v. Pimentel-Ornelas, 2012 — 566 U.S. 1018 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Holder, Attorney General v. Mojica; Holder, Attorney General v. Parra Camacho; Holder, Attorney General v. Becerra; Holder, Attorney General v. Pimentel-Ornelas
566 U.S. 1018·Supreme Court of the United States·2012
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
MAY 29, 2012
No. 11-99.
Holder, Attorney General v. Mojica. Holder, Attorney General v. Parra Camacho. Holder, Attorney General v. Becerra. Holder, Attorney General v. Pimentel-Ornelas.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 9th Cir.;
No. 11-103.
No. 11-104.
No. 11-831.
C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 412 Fed. Appx. 32;
C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 411 Fed. Appx. 67; and
C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 432 Fed. Appx. 681. Certiorari granted, judgments vacated, and cases remanded for further consideration in light of Holder v. Martinez Gutierrez, ante, p. 583.