Tax

CANAL-COMMERCIAL NATIONAL BANK, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

63 F.2d 621·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1933

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

CANAL-COMMERCIAL NATIONAL BANK, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. No. 6563. Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Feb. 21, 1933. Rehearing Denied April 1, 1933. Benjamin W. Dart, of New Orleans, La., for petitioner. G. A. Youngquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., Se-wall Key and Helen R. Carloss, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., and C. M. Charest, Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, and J. Arthur Adams, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of Washington, D. C., for respondent. Before BRYAN, FOSTER, and SIBLEY, Circuit Judges. [MAJORITY — SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.] SIBLEY, Circuit Judge. This ease was submitted upon a stipulation that its decision abide that in the case of Canal-Commercial Trust & Savings Bank v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (C. C. A.) 63 F.(2d) 619, filed herewith. It is therefore considered that the petition for review be denied, and the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals be affirmed.