Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha et al.; United States House of Representatives v. Immigration and Naturalization Service et al.; United States Senate v. Immigration and Naturalization Service et al., 1981 — 454 U.S. 1077 · caselaw · US
General
Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha et al.; United States House of Representatives v. Immigration and Naturalization Service et al.; United States Senate v. Immigration and Naturalization Service et al.
454 U.S. 1077·Supreme Court of the United States·1981
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 80-1832. No. 80-2170. No. 80-2171.
Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha et al. United States House of Representatives v. Immigration and Naturalization Service et al. United States Senate v. Immigration and Naturalization Service et al.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 9th Cir. [Probable jurisdiction postponed, ante, p. 812];
C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 812]; and
C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 812.] Motion of the Solicitor General for divided argument and for additional time for oral argument granted, and an additional 30 minutes allotted for oral argument.