Skip to main content

Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Scott et al. v. United States; Kulko v. Superior Court of California in and for the City and County of San Francisco (Horn, Real Party in Interest); Collection Consultants, Inc., et al. v. Texas; Drebin et al. v. United States; Nickell v. United States; Martin B. Glauser Dodge Co. v. Chrysler Corp. et al.; Fisher v. Ohio; Lax v. United States; Lee v. United States; Harris v. United States District Court for the District of Kansas; Thomas v. Georgia; Batten v. Virginia; Clayton v. Loggins, Correctional Superintendent, et al.; Justice v. Hesselden Plumbing Co.; Wion v. United States; Sek v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.; Corn v. Georgia; Downing v. Fraggassi et al.; O'Neal v. Griffin et al.; Sellars v. Busch et al.; DeSantis v. United States; Pierce v. Indiana et al.; Davis v. United States; Supplee v. United States, 1978 — 438 U.S. 908 · caselaw · US