Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Pennsylvania v. Nelson, 1955 — 348 U.S. 949 · caselaw · US
General
Pennsylvania v. Nelson
348 U.S. 949·Supreme Court of the United States·1955
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 236.
Pennsylvania v. Nelson.
Louis C. Wyman, Attorney General, filed the motion for the State of New Hampshire.
[MAJORITY]
Certiorari, 348 U. S. 814, to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Western District. The motion of the State of New Hampshire for leave to appear and present oral argument, as amicus curiae, is granted. The United States, having heretofore been requested to file a brief, is invited to argue orally.