Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John C. Orrell et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. The Bay Manufacturing Company, 1905 — 198 U.S. 581 · caselaw · US
General
John C. Orrell et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. The Bay Manufacturing Company
198 U.S. 581·Supreme Court of the United States·1905
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 398.
John C. Orrell et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. The Bay Manufacturing Company.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Mississippi.
Motion to dismiss submitted May 15, 1905.
Decided May 29, 1905.
Mr. E. M. Barber, Mr. Frederic D. McKenney, Mr. Wayne MacVeagh, Mr. J. S. Flannery and Mr. William Hitz for plaintiffs in error.
Mr. E.. J. Bowers for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction, on the authority of Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U. S. 173.