Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Pollack v. Association of the Bar of the City of New York et al., 1959 — 359 U.S. 972 · caselaw · US
General
Pollack v. Association of the Bar of the City of New York et al.
359 U.S. 972·Supreme Court of the United States·1959
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 614,
Misc.
Pollack v. Association of the Bar of the City of New York et al.
Petitioner, pro se.
Frank H. Gordon for the Association of the Bar of the City of New York, Jacob Burns for the New York County Lawyers Association, and David M. Potts for the Bronx County Bar, Association, respondents..
[MAJORITY]
Court of Appeals of New York. Certiorari denied.