Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Geneva Mineral Springs Company, Limited, Respondent, v. Stephen Coursey, Appellant, Impleaded with Others, 1902 — 171 N.Y. 664 · caselaw · US
General
The Geneva Mineral Springs Company, Limited, Respondent, v. Stephen Coursey, Appellant, Impleaded with Others
171 N.Y. 664·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Geneva Mineral Springs Company, Limited, Respondent, v. Stephen Coursey, Appellant, Impleaded with Others.
Geneva. Mineral Springs Go. v. Ooursey, 57 App. Div. 620, modified.
(Argued May 19, 1902;
decided June 10, 1902.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered December 29, 1900, modifying, and affirming as modified, a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee.
Charles A. Hawley and George L. Bachman for appellant.
John Gillette for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment modified by deducting the sum of $1,760, with interest from May 3, 1900, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs to either party; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ,