Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Valenti v. Lumbard, Chief Judge, U. S. District Court, et al., 1968 — 393 U.S. 929 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Valenti v. Lumbard, Chief Judge, U. S. District Court, et al.
393 U.S. 929·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
November 4, 1968.
No. 1065,
Mise.
Valenti v. Lumbard, Chief Judge, U. S. District Court, et al.
[MAJORITY]
Request for acceleration of time within which respondents may submit their response to motion for leave to file petition for mandamus denied without prejudice to consideration of petition on its merits.