General
WASHBURN v. PULLMAN'S PALACE-CAR CO.
76 F. 1005·United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·1896
Before COLT, Circuit Judge, and NELSON and WEBB, District Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
WASHBURN v. PULLMAN’S PALACE-CAR CO.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, First Circuit.
September 16, 1896.)
No. 138.
PullmaN’s Palace.'Cap. Co. v. Wasuuuiín, 66 Fu». 790, Au’e-ikmed.
Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts.
This was a writ of scire facias sued out by the Pullman’s Palace-Car Company against Frank L. Washburn fo enforce against, him a liability for costs as indorser of the writ in an action brought against the Pullman’s Palace-Car Company by one Maggie M. Harrison, in which .iudgment had been rendered against ¡he'plaintiff for $813.94 costs. The circuit court gave judgment. See 66 Fed. 790, where the opinion there rendered will be found in full. The defendant brought error.
Freedom Hutchison, for plaintiff in error.
Benj. N. Johnson, for defendant in error.
Before COLT, Circuit Judge, and NELSON and WEBB, District Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
In this case we agree with the reasoning in the opinion, and with the conclusion reached by the circuit court. The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.