Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Richard K. Fox, Appellant, v. The Rural Home Company (Limited), Respondent, 1898 — 157 N.Y. 684 · caselaw · US
General
Richard K. Fox, Appellant, v. The Rural Home Company (Limited), Respondent
157 N.Y. 684·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Richard K. Fox, Appellant, v. The Rural Home Company (Limited), Respondent.
Vox v. Rural Rome Go., 90 Hun, 365, affirmed.
(Argued October 7, 1898;
decided October 25, 1898.)
Appeal from an order of the late General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered November 23,1895, sustaining defendant’s exceptions, ordered to be heard in the first instance at General Term, and granting a new trial.
Herbert H. Walker for appellant.
C. A. de Cersdorff and Charles Steele for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered for the defendant on the stipulation, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur.